![]() A time extension should be issued if the ruling has taken more than a minute. The purpose of a Warning is to alert judges and players involved that a problem has occurred and to keep a permanent record of the infraction in the DCI Penalty Database. Warnings are used in situations of incorrect play when a small amount of time is needed to implement the corrective procedure. Warning A Warning is an officially tracked penalty. When that player’s deck is found to be illegal because of these cards, the Head Judge applies the normal procedure for fixing the decklist, but may downgrade the penalty to a Warning because of the direct error of the judge. For example, a player asks a judge whether a card is legal for a format and is told yes. If a member of the tournament staff gives a player erroneous information that causes them to commit a violation, the Head Judge is authorized to downgrade the penalty. When a judge makes a mistake, he or she should acknowledge the mistake, apologize to the players, and fix it if it is not too late. ![]() If another judge feels deviation is appropriate, he or she must consult with the Head Judge. The Rules Enforcement Level, round of the tournament, age or experience-level of the player, desire to educate the player, and certification level of the judge are NOT exceptional circumstances. Significant and exceptional circumstances are rare-a table collapses, a booster contains cards from a different set, etc. The Head Judge may not deviate from this guide’s procedures except in significant and exceptional circumstances or a situation that has no applicable philosophy for guidance. Only the Head Judge is authorized to issue penalties that deviate from these guidelines. More significant violations are addressed by first identifying what infraction applies, then proceeding with the corresponding instructions. In both these situations, the judge should ensure that the game progresses normally. If the players are playing in a way that is clear to both players, but might cause confusion to an external observer, judges are encouraged to request that the players make the situation clear, but not assess an infraction or issue any penalty. If a minor violation is quickly handled by the players to their mutual satisfaction, a judge does not need to intervene. ![]() Penalties are also for the deterrence and education of every other player in the event and are also used to track player behavior over time. This is done through both an explanation of where the rules or policies were violated and a penalty to reinforce the education. The purpose of a penalty is to educate the player not to make similar mistakes in the future. Knowledge of a player’s history or skill does not alter an infraction, but it may be taken into account during an investigation. Judges may intervene to prevent or preempt errors occurring outside of a game. Judges don’t stop play errors from occurring, but instead deal with errors that have occurred, penalize those who violate rules or policy, and promote fair play and sporting conduct by example and diplomacy. A judge shouldn’t intervene in a game unless he or she believes a rules violation has occurred, a player with a concern or question requests assistance, or the judge wishes to prevent a situation from escalating. ![]() GENERAL PHILOSOPHY Judges are neutral arbiters and enforcers of policy and rules. CR: 803: Attack Left and Attack Right Options.CR: 802: Attack Multiple Players Option.CR: 801: Limited Range of Influence Option.CR: 707: Face-Down Spells and Permanents.CR: 616: Interaction of Replacement and/or Prevention Effects.CR: 613: Interaction of Continuous Effects.CR: 608: Resolving Spells and Abilities.CR: 602: Activating Activated Abilities.CR: Section 6: Spells, Abilities, and Effects.CR: 212: Information Below the Text Box.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |